A personal history of electronic writing For the first time, I no longer have a copy of Microsoft Word installed on either of my computers. That’s some change.
I wrote my first two books, and many hundreds of, in Word. But I’m writing my third book in an inexpensive yet wonderful piece of Mac-only software written by a single person instead of a “business unit” at Redmond.
Scoured of Word, my computers feel clean, refreshed, relieved of a hideous and malign burden. How did it come to this? I remember when Word was all clean and sci-fi and inspiring, on the sharp monochrome screens of late-1980s and early-1990s Macs. When I was at university, hardly anyone owned a computer. We wrote our final dissertations on Mac Classics running Word in the college Computer Room. Afterwards, when I began to write for newspapers, the first electronic writing tool I owned was one of these.
For some reason the fact that this is called an Elektrische Schreibmaschine in German makes me feel all nostalgic for the ultrasmooth Kraftwerk future it seems I was living back then without even realising it, tapping out theatre reviews on a six-line green LCD (not even backlit), and then watching the typewriter daisywheel chatter back and forth to print a hard copy, that I would then take to the library and send to the or the, via a facsimile machine, at 10p per page. After a while I was able to buy a black-and-white PowerBook 520 running Word 5: Screenshot: Many people agree that revision 5.1a, specifically, was the best version of Word that Microsoft has ever shipped, combining utility and minimalist elegance with reliability. Sadly for me, although it wasn’t strictly necessary, after a few years and a colour Performa I “upgraded” to Word 98, and somehow the magic was gone. Yes, I turned off all the crappy lurid toolbars and tried to make the compositional space as simple as possible, but by this time Word was stuffed with all kinds of “features” that let you print a pie-chart on the back of a million envelopes or publish your cookery graphs to your “world wide web home-page”, and it already felt to me that Word was only grudgingly letting me write nothing but, you know, words.
Got out of Word 98 and onto the streets, but not without routine crashes and the occasional catastrophic loss of a few finely honed paragraphs. I was still somehow brainwashed, though, as perhaps many people still are today, into believing that Word was the “serious” word-processor: the professional tool for anyone who did heavy lifting with language. Part of the reason for Microsoft’s success in this propaganda trick, I think, was its brilliant choice of file-name extension. Think about it:.doc. That means “document”.
A.doc just is a document, right? And a document has to be a.doc. Stands to reason. Anything else would look amateurish. If they had called their files.mwd or something, we might have all jumped ship a lot sooner. Anyway, through inertia, through not even thinking about whether alternatives existed, I continued to stick with Word. And then, like a cunning crack dealer, Microsoft threw me a freebie twist that had me hooked anew.
It was Live Word Count, which (IIRC) appeared in Word v. Ah, Live Word Count.
When pretty much everything you write has a word-limit attached, and you realise after long and tragic experience that exceeding that limit will not cause the editor to expand the space available to you in tribute to your genius but will instead cause the sub-editors unerringly to home in precisely on the bits that must not be cut if the article is still to make any sense and cut them, then you need to know at every stage how much you have written, and how much you have left to go. With Live Word Count, there was no longer any need to hit a key combination every 10 seconds to check the word-count (which was often a way of procrastinating). The word count was permanently right there in the toolbar, updating as you typed. It was a beautiful thing, a real boon to anyone who wrote to predetermined length. So I couldn’t leave Word now, could I? (In the mean time, I also had one of these.
It was for filing articles while travelling, but I often preferred to write on that machine, with its small monochrome LCD, even when my desktop or laptop Mac was available. So something, some unexamined preference, was percolating in my mind. Eventually the Psion broke, and nothing as good has replaced it as an ultramobile writing tool. So much for progress.) Anyway, a few more years, and eventually got out of Word v. X on my PowerMac G5 and on to the streets, but not without routine crashes and the occasional catastrophic loss of a few finely honed paragraphs. (Sound familiar?) And then I began to feel a vague dissatisfaction. My eye started roving.
I would check out the other word-processors walking down the street, observing their smooth lines and lithe swing, imagining what it would be like to be with them instead. Crucially, Live Word Count became available in a range of other programs. (Amazingly, though, it seems that PC users did not get a live word count from Microsoft until Word 2007.) Mac users can now get it pretty much anywhere.
The guitar-rocking genius at even hacked me up a version of TextEdit that had a live word count in a floating window. The second crucial thing was an answer to prayers I hadn’t even known I was praying. It was Full-Screen Mode, which I first discovered in. ((WriteRoom is Mac-only, but PC users can try a similar experience with.)) WriteRoom’s slogan is “distraction-free writing”, and it does just what it says on the tin. Your entire screen is blacked out, except for the text you are working on. I now use WriteRoom for all my journalism. When I’m working, the screen of my MacBook looks like this: Pretty old-skool, huh?
It’s perfect: far less temptation to switch to a browser window, much better concentration on the text in front of you. WriteRoom has a “typewriter-scrolling mode”, so that the line you are typing is always centred in the screen, not forever threatening to drop off the bottom, and what you have already written scrolls rapidly up off the top of the screen, dissuading you from idly rereading it. It’s a bit like the endless roll of typewriter paper on which Jack Kerouac wrote On the Road. So WriteRoom allows me to turn my whizzy modern computer into the nearest equivalent possible (allowing for modern conveniences like backup to the internet and so on) to my old Brother typewriter and its six-line LCD.
The focus is on the words and nothing else. Except for that line you can just make out at the bottom left of the screen. That’s the Live Word Count.
Microsoft Word still uses the metaphor of the page, the computer screen that imitates a blank, bounded sheet of physical paper. For me, this is outdated and unimaginative. It has become a barrier rather than a window. And there is always the distraction of changing font and line-spacing, jumping ahead too quickly to imagining the text as a visual, physical product instead of a process, a fluid semantic interplay.
Instead, turning my MacBook into a kind of replica 1980s IBM machine, with the words glowing and hovering in an interstellar void, is liberating: as though I am composing the Platonic ideal of a text that might eventually take many different forms. Through WriteRoom I then discovered, a more sophisticated program with excellent features for managing very large documents or document collections: like a book. I couldn’t have written Unspeak, with its many hundreds of footnotes, in WriteRoom; but I could have in Scrivener.
I’m writing my next book in Scrivener, and a significant part of my enjoyment of the process is that I’m not doing it in Word, so somehow it doesn’t feel so much like cubicular, fluorescent-lit work. And it can also do Platonic simplicity. When working on a chapter, I set Scrivener up to give me exactly the same full-screen orange-on-black view as my WriteRoom environment above, with one exception: the Live Word Count doesn’t appear unless you mouse over the bottom of the screen. Which is perfect for writing a book, where length is not crucial on a paragraph-to-paragraph basis, and it eliminates the last possible distraction from your mindworld. And imagine trying the following with Microsoft – when I first used Scrivener I was a bit irritated that the cursor was a thin blinking line, which I found interfered with my new-found writing Zen.
So I posted on the programmer’s forum saying could we please maybe have the same square, non-blinking block cursor as you get in WriteRoom? With the next beta, he had done it. That’s customer service. ((As Scrivener’s creator relates, he emailed Jesse Grosjean, Writeroom’s author, wondering how he did the block-cursor thing; very generously, Grosjean just gave him the code, and even recommends Scrivener on his own website.)) Am I not worried that WriteRoom and Scrivener, delightful though they are, are small products from tiny outfits, not “supported” by the corporate might of a large company such as Microsoft? Because actually my writing is now more secure. Instead of a bloated proprietary file format like.doc, both programs use accessible formats –.txt,.xml,.rtf ((RTF is actually proprietary, originally developed by DEC and now owned by Microsoft, but it’s so widespread now that (fingers crossed) they won’t be able to break it.)) – that (as far as one can predict these things) will be readable forever.
My new book is one big “project” in Scrivener, but under the hood each chapter is a universally accessible.rtf file, which can be opened and used in a multitude of other programs. The last question is one of interoperability, and on first sight it’s a serious one. Surely if everyone else is using Microsoft Word and we are sending documents back and forth to each other, then I need to use Microsoft Word too? I imagine that kind of reasoning sells the majority of new copies. But for me it doesn’t matter at all. If I just need to read a Word document, I can open it in pretty much any Mac program. If I need to exchange files back and forth using comments or Track Changes, I can do that through.
If someone really insists on sending me a Word document so festooned with all its formatting “features”, tables, graphics, and so on that it doesn’t work in another program, I am just likely to respond: What the fuck? So that’s how it is now.
I write within the pure, glowing universes of Scrivener and WriteRoom. I send articles to the as plain-text rather than.doc. I am confident that I will be able to open those articles and the chapters of my book again, if I want to, in 30 years’ time. And now a 1000-word review weighs 4K instead of 30K. I weep at all the innocent electrons I wastefully killed over the years, sending those massive, lumbering Word documents through the internet.
I apologise for my particle profligacy. I have learned my lesson. Goodbye, cruel Word. ((Update: is now in beta. The best PC equivalent of Writeroom is probably the excellent. This essay now also appears in Mauk & Metz (eds.),.)). I almost switched to a Mac for the slightly-too-in-love-with-itself Scrivener but then decided all the options would distract as much as help.
JDarkRoom doesn’t have the typewriter scrolling mode. Can I justify an expensive new laptop to run a piece of software to turn it into a DEC VT102? Are there internerd social rules for a first post on a friend’s new website? I should say ‘Great site, BTW!’ or something but it seems a bit crass.
Perhaps something that shows I’ve done my research like, ‘It’s way better than StevenPoole.com, seriously, well done.’. I identify with your writing experience on the Brother, my version being a Smith-Corona (single-line LCD) which I still have in my closet. I’ve never really liked Word (after 1990) for the Mac, and gravitated to WordPerfect.
In terms of wordprocessing, I have been suffering since the end of Mac OS 9. I’ve given Scrivener two half-hearted tries, and your article will get me to try again. My current solution, is a program called Tinderbox by Eastgate Systems. The program has a long learning curve (took me a year to really figure out up from down), but the program is very powerful. While it can be used as a simple typing interface, the value of the program is that it allows you to create a file structure with your own metadata. It is more akin to a database for wordprocessing but even that is a ham-handed description.
It’s.tbx files are simple XML. But my comment isn’t intended as a plug for Tinderbox (of which I am only a satisfied user). I mainly want to acknowledge that there is something very wrong with the state of the art of wordprocessing programs and I think many technically competent writers (not programmers) wish something existed to fill the gap. I want something very much like WriteRoom but that has a footnote mechanism that allows you to write note text with the context in full view.
So, thank you for the thoughtful write up. I look forward to checking out Unspeak.
Johnnie Wilcox aka mistersquid. For those of you who are reading this article looking for alternatives to Word, I’ve gotta plug Mellel. It’s got a full-screen mode like WriteRoom, and is entirely styles driven. I’ve been using it for the last two years, and I’m definitely hooked. It’s got a bit of a learning curve at first, but once you get going with it, you’ll wonder how you ever survived in Word. Plus it integrates with bibliographic software (Bookends) and its format is XML so you can apply XSLTs to convert it to other formats (LaTeX, for example.). Ulysses is somewhat sleeker than Scrivener, but otherwise similar: It also features full screen mode, chapter management, word count etc., however no footnotes, no PDF/image/web page storage, and no screenplay mode, as it is aimed more at the “literary” writer.
Sometimes I miss these things, but in general I find it pretty versatile. Ulysses exports as RTF, DOC, LaTeX, or PDF, while internally files are saved as TXT (an important matter, if you wonder, whether the software will still run – or the company still exist – after the next major OS upgrade). “although PowerPoint takes badness to a whole new level” – WOPR Amen, brother (or sister).
I really thought Microsoft would do the typical Microsoft thing with PowerPoint 2007 and lift some of the beauty from Apple’s Keynote (in addition to adding a bunch of new, useless features, another “Microsoft thing”). Same crappy-looking presentations with a frustrating new interface.
Nice work as always, MS! I am encouraged that people are starting to reject the “More is More!” philosophy that is Microsoft and choosing more “elegant” (dare I use the word?) apps to get the job done. I uninstalled Office when iWork ’08 was announced. Microsoft’s stranglehold on the planet will soon be but a bad memory. The last time I used Word it was because a publisher demanded that I turn in book chapters using their Word template. Ironically, the book was about a Web publishing system that gracefully handled text, HTML, XML, and more, and even in beta it did not crash like Word and I was left wondering why I wasn’t just writing the book in the app I was writing about.
At one point a Word document became “corrupted” and we had to go back to a previous version and redo the work since. The experience was draining, it felt like fighting with Word, there was never a time where it was supportive of my work. It is not a writing tool, it is not even a good typewriter replacement and that’s Microsoft’s core business (replacing the Selectric in offices worldwide). I use BBEdit now to write text, as well as write HTML, CSS, JS and a little PHP. In all cases every character is important and BBEdit treats it that way.
I set the font to Monaco 14 and get big smooth letters with accurate spacing so I never guess about one or two spaces, it is easy to write, easy to edit, easy to store, easy to share. Plain Unicode text with Unix line breaks is as close to universal text as you will find. And BBEdit has never crashed on me in 10 years which I still find to be incredible. I’ve never lost a single character of text. There is a visceral feeling of reliability that contributes to writing-focus not computer-focus. Also BBEdit is very scriptable, you can write a short AppleScript for tasks you do again and again, like say you routinely find-and-replace 10 phrases you can make a single script that does all of them as one step on any document or folder of documents or selection of documents.
It’s a power tool for text, a Photoshop for text. There is a free version called TextWrangler that is quite good also, you are better there than in Word.
TextWrangler is a great addition to the built-in iLife in a Mac. Anyone who is using TextEdit owes themselves a look at TextWrangler, it’s much, much better. The fact is, Microsoft’s software is not professional grade.
They use an experimental, radical form of software development that is more akin to a game of telephone than a collaborative project and has never produced anything with any quality. The people who create Word are as helpless to improve it as their miserable users. Text-editing is such a simple technical matter at this point in computer history that what separates good text-editing apps from bad is a little art, the features we love in BBEdit or WriteRoom or Scrivener are artistic touches that Microsoft is not capable of. Norm’s comment: “the fact that ANY printed document can be generated in MS Word” Wrong, wrong, wrong, and then again wrong.
That’s why so many people have used Adobe InDesign, PageMaker (and even Quark XPress from time to time); because Word is so wonderful at page layout. Personally, what I’ve often found Word likes to do is change a 40-page proposal into a 300-page monstrosity (with, inexplicably, 1 line of text on each page) twenty minutes before it needs to be printed and delivered. This has happened several times. BBEdit is the answer for writing; then use a real page-layout application for page layout, and then Word can’t ruin your day.
I use Mellel and Pages. I use them because my ideal text processor just doesn’t exist. My ideal would be some sort of mixt of LATEX and VIM with a good deal of friendliness. When we write, we know what we’re doing. When we type a title, an abstract, a subtitle, a paragraph, when we quote, we know what we’re doing. Applying styles is just a way to show what things are.
It’s part of the text processing. Unfortunately, IMO, our tools have some progress to do in the styling. Presently, either you write all your text, then come back on it, select your title, apply the style, select a quote, apply the style, etc. Pages has multiple selections), or you do it while writing, which is a distraction.
No Need To Swap Disks For Ms Word 5.1a For Mac
Or you type the code, like in most LATEX editors, while writing or after you’ve finished. Not really friendly. My ideal text processor would have a command mode. Command mode, command line, we’ve come to be afraid even of the words.
We shouldn’t. A command mode would just make all your keys function keys. You fire your text processor, it opens in command mode (let you chose the kind of document, or open on the default), waiting for you first order. You type T for title, and it goes automatically in edition mode, centered, bold, with the required font-size.
You hit Enter, it goes back to command mode. Hit “t”, you have a subtitle.
Hit “p”, a paragraph; “l”, a new line, “q”, a quote No need to write a command, no need to go to the mouse to select some option in a menu, styling in your workflow, without distraction. Plus, it wouyld still be possible to disable the command mode, and work the traditional way. I wish I was a developper. I did the same thing as you last year. I realized that the only thing I used Word for was applying styles. My personal style library hadn’t changed meaningfully in at least five years.
Everything else in Word was superfluous. It’s not a bad program in my opinion, but it’s not a good writing environment and it’s not a particularly professional tool either. I spent some time looking at alternatives and eventually settled on LaTeX with TeXShop. LaTeX is plain text where you apply styles textually, which meets my needs perfectly.
It has a high learning curve, but once I got my personal styles transferred over from Word I was fine. It handles multiple tables of contents, tables of citations, etc. In a bulletproof fashion, whereas in Word I always had to do a final readthrough and make sure cross-references were properly resolved everywhere (I’ve been burned by Word too many times). Thanks to all for the interesting links to alternatives.
The more the better. MrSquid: I want something very much like WriteRoom but that has a footnote mechanism that allows you to write note text with the context in full view. If I understand you correctly, Scrivener lets you do exactly that. Fred: good points about BBEdit and TextWrangler – I used to use the latter, and am now a newly converted user of (from which my original post was sent directly to the blog). A highly configurable, Rolls Royce text editor like BBEdit or TextMate is extremely handy, but my own preference is not to use it for the intial draft of an extended prose piece.
(AFAIK, no true full-screen view in either.) I set the font to Monaco 14 Monaco FTW! I adored Cryptonomicon (and Quicksilver, ). Arguably WriteRoom offers some of what Stephenson likes about emacs. In WriteRoom you have a.txt document, and you fill it with words. There is pretty much nothing else to do. Afterwards, of course, the editing power of emacs is much superior, but I don’t find I often need to do much more than find/replace after proofing on paper (which I still do for book chapters or long articles).
Joe: Why don’t you just run WordPerfect 5.1 for DOS and be done with it? You want me to install DOS on my Mac? What a great article, very useful for someone like myself who is looking for a new tool for, you know, WRITING. I hate Word, it gets in my way.
I want a software tool that keeps all my notes and reference in handy spots. I also want something that gives me a handy quick overview of what I’ve done, to see how it hangs together (or doesn’t) and lets me move blocks of text easily. I didn’t know such an animal existed, so I have been writing in Quark. Quark, at least, lets you insert boxes of text within your existing text, anywhere you want.
It also lets me resize text easily and precisely, as well as change colors. (I realize Word does some of these things, but it’s a pain. Not ‘organic’.) That’s how I begin pulling ideas together, discarding redundant or weak ones, reinforcing recurring ones.
If any of the many tools mentioned here do this sort of thing better, I am SO there. Thanks to the author and all the commenters, you made my day! I wrote a book last year, and had made my mind up that I’d try and avoid Word.
I think Word has its virtues, but after looking around, I wanted something that “didn’t get into the way,” and would let me write. I also liked the idea of the distraction-free black screen. I choose Scrivener. I can’t always spell it correctly, but it worked for me. The editor wanted my book in.DOC format, so I simply exported it as RTF, added-in the screenshots, and sent it in from Word. So, no, I haven’t deleted Word yet. But I find I use it very little for writing, or in my job.
In fact, when I get folks who send me something in email as a Word document (instead of simply composing it in the email itself), it drives me nuts. As an educator, I try and convince our teachers to use something simple like TextEdit rather than Word. The most important thing is the writing, not the ways you can format it for the printer. I find writing in “text editors” rather than layout programs is far more productive. Incidentally, this is why I dislike Pages. I agree with the other comment write it up, and pass it to something more capable for output (like InDesign).
I am an admitted Scrivener fan. What I like about Scrivener that a standard word-processor or text editor does not include is the ability to write in a non-linear manner. Scrivener allows all the separate bits/snippets to be organized however you want.
The second bit of magic is temporarily allowing you to group whatever bits you want together. Organization using a standard linear wordprocessor left me befuddled, because I would invariably have a great idea that was important to the piece but not necessarily related to what I was writing. Scrivener allows me to write my thoughts however illogically they appear and then I can work on the correct placement and transitions later. Full screen edits, corkboards, keywords, split views all add a great deal of depth to a well thought product, but the conceptual breakthrough is that this program allows me write what I want, and then to string together my thoughts in an easily organized manner and for what it has done for my writing, the cost is a steal. Niran: I would invariably have a great idea that was important to the piece but not necessarily related to what I was writing.
Scrivener allows me to write my thoughts however illogically they appear and then I can work on the correct placement and transitions later. I find that very useful too. SteveT: Pop open TextEdit, and hit ctrl+option+command+8. Stretch out the window ’til it’s nice and large. Yes – for me that’s nearly good enough.
But you still see all the menu and scrollbar crap. (Also, Apple changed ctrl-opt-cmd-8 at some point, either between 10.2 and 10.3 or 10.3 and 10.4, so it stopped being monochrome and did a fancy reversal of colours as well, which I hated.) Sorry to anyone who tried to come here last night when the server was borked. Anyone referred from Daring Fireball or (couple of hundred comments over there, some interesting) should now be seeing the Coral Cache page, which hopefully will keep loads reasonable. Personally, I like to use NisusWriter Pro in full screen mode for writing. If you set up your styles in advance it will use them to display while writing. I haven’t found a way yet, however, to show a word count while you are in full screen mode.
I think the reason I prefer NWP is because I personally don’t like working with a black background–black on white works best for me. I’ve often wondered what a word processor from the OmniGroup would look like? More than just about any other software company, they seem to be able to strike the right balance between a great (and extensive) feature set, while making the user experience clean and intuitive. Pingback:. Pingback:. As has been previously mentioned, LaTex is a good text-based alternative, particularly in combination with the SFFMS macro package, which supports novel and short story manuscript (typescript) formatting.
Although I’ve been a Word user for many years, I will not willingly do so again, as it’s just too expensive, bloated and feature-ridden for my simple use. As has been said of the dancing bear, the miracle is not that Word works (bear dances) well, the miracle is that Word works (bear dances) at all. Back in the Word 4.0 days, I preferred Microsoft Write. It had a simple interface, the normal formatting stuff, handled columns, would even do a stupid mail merge. The application itself was relatively small and quick, it saved.doc format files, and was considerably cheaper. Microsoft could have done nothing to that code other than update the document filters and make it a universal binary and people would still use it, I think. That was their best word processor effort.
Something usable and useful? If Microsoft added columns and mail merge to WordPad in Windows, would people use Word? I used Nisus Writer in the OS 8 days. I loved it then. I have not tried the new incarnation but the old one had some wonderful writer’s tools. I have Scrivener but mainly use it for organizing my notes. I’ll try it for my writing.
Hi Steven, I just came over from the Scrivener forum. This is a great article that took a lot of words right out of my mouth (or from my keypad?). Recently I wrote a bit about Scrivener on my website, but since you dwell deeper into certain aspects I left out, I added a link to your blog on my page. Another software suggestion: For formatting (whenever it is required) I use Nisus Writer Pro, a very elegant app, that doesn’t scare you with its palettes as Mellel does.
With Scrivener and NWP nobody will ever need Word again. Michael PS: Beautiful music here too!.
Pingback:. I am a WriteRoom user almost exclusively now. Oh, yes, I do copy and paste my text into Word to format the text with headers and footnote’s as demanded by my University, but when it comes to crunching out those papers and exam assignments nothing beats WriteRoom in terms of promoting concentration and productivity. I must honestly say that Word has always baffled me. I used it only for a few years, mainly between 2000 and 2003 in College and I never had anything good come out of these encounters, as I simply couldn’t concentrate. When I started at my current study I just knew I had to do something about it, and even used TextEdit for a while until I found WriteRoom. Now, I even also use it to take notes while at lectures.
The green writing on a black background is perfect for a dark room with my backlight turned down to the lowest setting to save my battery life and the lack of distraction on the screen means that I can concentrate on the lecture at hand. Over the last 8 months I’ve tried most of the writing programs mentioned in the comments. What a rich time it is to be a writer who uses a Mac. Avenir, WriteRoom, Ulysses and Jer’s Novel Writer are all great tools, as is Mellel. But Scrivener was the one I ended up buying. It just works best for the way I write.
A feature that no one has mentioned is that Scrivener lets you mark up text and export it to LaTeX or HTML. It is a bit more involved to write just a page or two in Scrivener than in some of the other editors, so I often dash off text in BBEdit. But for longer documents that require research, extensive notes and re-organizable sections Scrivener’s incredible.
Now that Pages works with Word’s change tracking features, I use that to trade files back and forth with my editor, who doesn’t even know that I’m no longer using Word. Scrivener for complex documents, Pages for editing and formatting and BBEdit for short text, what a treasure of excellent tools. And with others just as good for those with different writing needs, it’s bye-bye Word. It’s been nice knowin’ ya. I do love Scrivener’s UI and overall concept, but its LaTeX export is a little underdeveloped at present.
I wish you could write custom export plugins directly, rather than having to export to MultiMarkdown and then munge that into LaTeX. Why not just export to XML and let someone write an XSLT to get to LaTeX.
That’s much more practical than having to parse MMD. As it’s set up right now, the LaTeX export is really designed more or less just to meet the needs of the MultiMarkdown guy who helped develop it. For instance, only supporting the use of the “memoir” LaTeX class is a strange choice, since that’s not not one of the more common document classes and has an additional learning curve on top of the standard LaTeX classes. With just a little bit more work in this area, Scrivener could really be a killer tool for scholars as well as writers.
It’s almost there now, and still well worth considering. I just wish it had direct XML export.
I don’t use MMD/LaTeX myself but AIUI you can modify the default XLSTs used by Scrivener/MMD or write your own: see eg. Michael Engler: thanks!
MattT: haiku reviews are a nice idea, as long as you aren’t getting paid by the word.;) I’m with Adam Kotkso in disagreeing with the claim that Microsoft has never produced anything of quality, though i’m not an Excel user so can’t comment on that. Still, Word was quality up until version 6. Also, IE4.5 & 5 on Mac OS 8-9 were pretty slick. Pingback:. Pingback:. Before embarking on my master thesis I tried several word processing options.
I finally ended up with using VIM, VIM-LaTeX-suite and LaTeX. This way I can concentrate on content and structure, leaving formatting to the TeX engine. One interesting approach I tired was using HTML and CSS coupled with Prince1. Writing HTML was a bit to verbose for my needs compared to LaTeX. LaTeX breaks passages into paragraphs by looking at linebreaks. HTML on the other hand needs a anchor and a closing anchor:.
Wow, fantastic article indeed, very well weighted. Here is another voice for Scrivener. I think text editors like BBEdit, Writeroom, Q10 (nice find for my PC using friends!), Textmate are great minimalist enviroments.
And BBEdit/Textmate are full on byte wranglers – wrestle that UTF8 into submission. Scrivener gets the magic of writing just right. A simple space that grows to fit your material. The flexibility of research notes, references, pulling in disparate inspiration into a single elegant interface.
Feeling structures build. You can use Scrivener as a blank sheet just fine, and if you need deeper layers, it gives them a-plenty. For the more scientific, outlining keeps you in order, bibliographic references can be copy/pasted from your reference manager software, you can keep research PDFs in line. Very neat you can dynamically search through all your research materials (including text of PDFs) in one place!. Pingback:.
Pingback:. Steve Thanks for highlighting JDarkroom for windows users, in addition to I mentioned earlier. I reckon Q10 is the most mature of these, (and doesn’t need java, or.net framework for the similar Dark Room). It’s quite customizable, and has an optional live word count, a word count target as a%, and a timer letting you how many words you’ve written in a specified period. Makes one into a writing maching;-) I just wrote a with it – was truly a liberating experience (compared with bloat-ware Word) Though with the plethora of writing tools for macs, esp reading the scrivener accolades, I’m almost tempted to switch to a mac (but have resisted its proprietary hardware.
Time to investigate dual booting OS’s). There appear to be some windows alternatives to scrivener such as or, but seem to fall short of what scrivener can do.
# # RTF is actually proprietary, originally developed by DEC and now owned by Microsoft, but it’s so widespread now that (fingers crossed) they won’t be able to break it. « # # Oh, so NOT true. There is NO standard too entrenched for Micro$oft to be able to break it. “Embrace, extend, and screw it up for others.” is their mantra. Look at Kerberos, top posting, etc. Just hope they don’t decide we suddenly need to drive on the left side of the road, or switch to forks on the other side of the plate. There are already multiple versions of RTF, and I’m sure more are coming.
It’s whatever they want it to be on a given day. See: & elsewhere. I live in Linux, and Scrivener may someday be available for us( someone posted on /. That this is being worked-on ),so for-now, we’ve little alternative. However Writer’s Cafe has one killer-app for us Linuxers( because we have no ability to remain in our gloriously configurable OS while running Mac sw ). It’s Story Lines app is the bees knees, compared with anything else I’ve seen in linux-native software.
( I’m NOT running Wine on any machine I need to trust – win-viruses can run in it too, trashing user’s stuff! ) They’ve a limited demo, try it your own self. People keep complaining about word “getting in the way” – is that code for “i have undiagnosed attention deficit disorder”?
I’ve always used word – sure it has features I’ll never use, so guess what, I don’t use them. I’ve never had serious issues with it messing up documents or loosing data. And as far as the supposedly out dated “physical page layout” just choose the “normal layout” and it is just continuous whiteness. You can also turn off all the toolbars in the view menu, so you’ll have a very simple box to write in with only the usual menu options above (file, edit, view, etc). Or, if you’re really easily distracted, just turn on full screen mode and you have a white screen with a cursor – doesn’t get much simpler than that. Is it that you don’t like word or that you’re just kind of anti-big business and so are bashing Microsoft products?
The latter is fine, but you don’t need to bash word to say that you’d just rather support a smaller operation. You youngsters! I well remember in the days of yore with my faithful 286 DOS machine at my side, using WordPerfect, the big blue screen in front of me and nothing else. I even sprang for a third party app that turned the big empty blue screen into a big empty white screen, so much like a blank sheet of typing paper. There were arguments about the horror of the blank screen, how it interfered with the writing process. I kid you not.
All those little buttons this crew despises are the direct result of the years of complaint over the keystroke commands WordPerfect and WordStar users had to memorize. Once again we see one generation’s blessing becoming another generation’s curse. What do I use? I also use NoteTab Pro.
I use RoughDraft. I use two Windows clones of WriteRoom, DarkRoom and WestEdit. I use Open Office. And I tweaked AbiWord, turning it into a WriteRoom clone. I also use a pen and paper, and even the backs of envelopes. If you save in rich text format or as text files, you can swap stuff around to your heart’s content. Word seems to handle the final printout better than the others, so the final edit usually takes place there.
R P Bird “You hunt the words, the words shouldn’t hunt you.”. ‘For some reason the fact that this is called an Elektrische Schreibmaschine in German makes me feel all nostalgic for the ultrasmooth Kraftwerk future it seems I was living back then without even realising it, tapping out theatre reviews on a six-line green LCD (not even backlit)’ Being brought up on 70s-80s sci-fi films, I can’t help but be disappointed in nanotechnology and laptops; of course it is practical but I was kind-of hoping that supercomputers would be reel-to reel-magnetic tape operated, bakelite or melamine monstrosities that would belch dot matrix print outs. On a more relevant note, I have linux on one computer; I prefer their word processing document to word and surely that says something about the limits of the free market? Anyway, hope your new book is going well. I’ve used MS Word to format 3 books and must admit it’s a bloated piece of software. Why WordProcessor won’t separate the content from the styling beats me and why people insist on using it is another mystery.
What makes things worse is that one of the main formats these days is HTML and both MS Word and Pages ’09 are atrocious in conversion. How on earth can two highly used programmes export such crap HTML? Unless they want to keep people locked into their proprietary format. I’m now moving everything to Multimarkdown from which I can convert the base document into just about any format I need including MS Word! Those who imply that Microsoft have produced something as imperfect and horrible as Word through sheer incompetence are missing the point. Word isn’t bad because MS can’t do better – they don’t want to do better. Upgrading Word is a revenue stream, they want people to be continually hungering for the next (‘improved’) version.
If they produced something simple and elegant there would be no upgrade path to lock people into. It’s simple business sense, even though I detest them for it. Actually I don’t really detest them for it – I am aghast at the endless stream of suckers who fall for it. Caveat Emptor. Great article. I dumped Microsoft Word and moved to Xiosis Scribe last year. Word is a bloated app that has not seen any new innovation in at least 10 years (IMHO).
Scribe is an easy to use word processor with mind mapping and outline view for planning, research tools including link to Mendeley, composer and layout. It has lots of productivity features for writers including a distraction free environment, quick clips, accent char help and more. You can configure the composer to be exactly like the darkroom. I haven’t missed word.
I hated that ribbon thing they put on Word 2007 and had me searching for things than writing. Scribe is pretty cool that way with text labels on everything. Way, way back in the days of CP/M and the old Byte magazine, Jerry Pournelle worked with Workman & Associates (Barry Workman) to “perfect” something called WRITE. Pournelle also wrote science fiction, often with Larry Niven, and wanted a simple, clean screen, as you describe.
He stuck with WRITE for a long time. I bought a copy on his recommendation and remember writing him a letter about how dissatisfied I was with it. I also discovered that MS Word can be configured to offer a simple, blank screen for clean typing. It takes a few clicks here and there to do it, but it can be done. In fact, Darkroom for Windows is based on MS Word and uses a Word macro to set up the screen.
I agree on Q10 being an effing good word cruncher on the PC. There are a lot of variations on the cleanroom writing environment for OS X, but I’ve yet to find one which does Live Word Count, hard wrap at say 65 characters AND makes it decently easy to print a few pages. Last thing I tried was BBEdit and it does suck in the printing dept and is like killing ants with a proton cannon. Anybody has any tips on the printing? Being thinking I’d write the text and then dump into a Scribus template for printing. Since we’re going down memory lane here, my first word processor was Perfect Writer, on a CP/M Kaypro.
Brilliant, if complex, program. My all-time favorite, though, is XyWrite III+, under DOS. Based on the mainframe publishing program, Atex, it was the best text editor ever. You youngsters will never have heard of it, but it was well-respected in its day. Now, on my Mac, I’m using Scrivener, and Bean, mostly, but I find uses for others except Word, which I’ve never even had on my Mac. Word was actually a fine program, when it was first introduced.
It’s architecture was quite advanced for its day. I used it for some twenty years, all on DOS/Windows. But as many have commented, over the years feature bloat crept in and the file structure became very unreliable. I don’t miss it at all now.